July 30, 2010 Leave a comment
Here’s the story that tells the reason for his imbecility.
Not the Front Row
October 17, 2007 5 Comments
Dr. James Watson, who along with Francis Crick, “discovered” the double helical structure of DNA, with a little help from one of their friends, X-Ray Crystallographer Rosalind Franklin.
Watson and Crick won the 1962 Nobel Prize in Medicine for their groundbreaking work as well as worldwide acclaim.
According to this story,
DNA pioneer Dr Watson, who discovered the double helix with Briton Francis Crick, has been roundly condemned for saying he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”.
Dr. Watson was also quoted as saying that while he hoped all races were equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true.”
He also added,
there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of people geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically.
Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so
Then of course, a statement to avoid the inevitable conclusion of his statements,
However, he said people should not discriminate racially, because “there are many people of colour who are very talented.”
These statements seem to be a racist’s dreams come true. One can almost see a collective “I told you so” from white supremacist groups.
I wonder if Watson realizes the import of what he allegedly said, and if he’s going to get Carleton Coon(ed) for said comments. Probably not since Watson’s words will probably be dismissed as the ramblings of an old man.
Watson has also made other brow raising comments, according to this story,
In 1997, he told a British newspaper that a woman should have the right to abort her unborn child if tests could determine it would be a homosexual.
Wonder what Joel Ginsberg would say to that?