The fatal difficulty of the “Scientific Outlook”
August 26, 2006 15 Comments
By the “scientific outlook”, I’m of course referring to the religion that is Naturalism, especially those within its largest denomination, Evolutionism. A great many holes have been and continue to be punched in this erroneous view of things, but I came across a concise summary of the fatal flaw in this worldview, from the pen of one CS Lewis:
“If minds are wholly dependent on brains, and brains on biochemistry, and biochemistry (in the long run) on the meaningless flux of atoms, I cannot understand how the thought of those minds should have any more significance than the sound of the wind in the trees.”
If Reason came from non-reason as the Evolutionists claim then how can we take their arguments seriously when their origin is non-reason and chaos? Someone please explain the consistency in this.